Most of those who were behind the creation of false pretexts to attack Iraq and Afghanistan have already admitted to have based their decisions on false intelligence about the existence of Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction.
Up to now, not one of them is held accountable to that decision which plunged the world into the War of Terror.
Innocent Blair, however, continue to justify his decision of joining the War of Terror by saying he needed to decide quickly as possible to save the United Kingdom from terrorists. Now, the entire Europe is flooded with refugees that are hard to distinguish from the bearded terrorists the “Coalition of the Willing” sought to eliminate.
The Chilcot Report carefully analyzed the Blair mindset during the crafting of the UK decision to go to war with the Bushes, and it arrived at a definite conclusion, i.e. that Blair wasn’t really under stress and was only compelled to make a harsh decision, but that going to war was a deliberate and systematically contrived undertaking.
In page after page, the report highlights how the former prime minister appeared to be privately saying one thing “sotto voce” to George W Bush, while keeping many of his own ministers – and military commanders – almost completely in the dark.
It also underlines how huge decisions about the legality of the war and the execution of the military campaign were never properly discussed at cabinet meetings.
In one particularly damning passage – paragraph 634 of the executive summary – Chilcot clinically exposes the inadequacies of organisation, analysis and management within government that contributed to Britain’s disastrous mission in Iraq.
All of these failures of leadership, the report notes, were down to the then prime minister. “Mr Blair did not establish clear ministerial oversight of post-conflict strategy, planning and preparation,” Chilcot wrote. Nor did he “ensure that ministers took the decisions needed to prepare a flexible, realistic and fully resourced plan integrating UK military and civilian contributions”.
The prime minister, Chilcot said, also failed to “seek adequate assurances that the UK was in a position to meet its likely obligations in Iraq”.
And despite concerns about the state of US preparations for war, Blair “did not make agreement on a satisfactory post-conflict plan a condition of UK participation in military action”. These omissions contributed to the chaos that engulfed British forces in Iraq after the invasion, the report states.
In short, they could not formulate a better post-war Iraq that would align perfectly with their constantly propagandized Western values of freedom and democratic ideals, because Iraq under Saddam Hussein was already enjoying relative peace and prosperity, as you will find at the end of this article, and therefore, wouldn’t be a breeding ground for terrorists that would one day attack the West, their basic fearmongering narrative to support preemptive strikes.
In spite of this clear violation of established international norms, the International Criminal Court refused to open an investigation on Blair’s involvement on the War of Terror, but is more than willing to prosecute foot soldiers who were just following orders from these suit and tie shenanigans.
But why would the allied institutions of the criminal cabal investigate their own errand boys through the ICC?
The court was specifically designed to serve only the interest of the criminal, hence the name International Criminal Court, not Justice for the Offended Court.
Adding to the frustration is the ICC’s 14-year history in which it has prosecuted Africans exclusively, during a time when the West has escalated its military interventions in the Middle East and North Africa, and Israel has conducted two bombing campaigns on Gazans. “The court has transformed itself into a political instrument targeting Africa and Africans,” Ethiopian Foreign Minister Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said at an African Union summit in 2013.
Above all, the best judge about Blair’s war in Iraq are the Iraqis themselves who were supposed to be saved from Saddam’s oppressive leadership…
Aside from the Iraqis themselves, even the Bushes’ WTC 911 accomplice Saudi Arabia has already said that the US fabricated the pretext for the War of Terror. So, would Blair, with his access to the best military intelligence on the planet, feign ignorance to the fact that even the militarily inferior Saudis have already attested was nothing more than a massive false flag operation?
“Those who follow American policy see that it is built upon the principle of advance planning and future probabilities. This is because it occasionally presents a certain topic to a country that it does not wish [to bring up] at that time but [that it is] reserving in its archives as an ace to play [at a later date] in order to pressure that country. Anyone revisiting… [statements by] George H.W. Bush regarding Operation Desert Storm might find that he acknowledged that the U.S. Army could have invaded Iraq in the 1990s, but that [the Americans] had preferred to keep Saddam Hussein around as a bargaining chip for [use against] other Gulf states. However, once the Shi’ite wave began to advance, the Americans wanted to get rid of Saddam Hussein, since they no longer saw him as an ace up their sleeve.
How can we hold people accountable for their bad decisions so that we can prevent deaths and destruction from happening in the future, if no bad leaders are put to the gallows?
How long will the world need to endure the fallacy of it all?
Russia is not taking things lightly as Putin ordered the creation of a separate agency purposely aimed at defeating color revolutions around the world, aside from repelling preparations for war disguised as NATO military exercise.
The General Staff Academy of Russia’s Armed Forces has been working on the topic since the end of 2014 and is now set to develop a complex manual on countering “color revolutions”, Russia’s daily newspaper Kommersant reports on Wednesday.
One of its purposes is to define the most considerable threats to Russian security up to 2020 and come up with a unified set of tactics for revealing, preventing and counteracting the technique of using “color revolutions” to facilitate regime change, the newspaper quotes its sources in the Defense Ministry as saying.
Russia to monitor NATO vessels in Bosphorus with new long-range radars from Crimea – source https://t.co/an3dNGJnP8
— RT (@RT_com) July 6, 2016
The original purveyors of the War of Terror are now enjoying their well-deserved retirement, in spite of the claims that the White Dragon Society is running after them.
And just like any other Nazionist military invasions before it, the real objective was not about freedom and democracy. It’s primarily about…
WHILE working in Iraq, Tony witnessed the discovery of massive haul of gold bullion belonging to Iraq dictator Saddam Hussein.
The gold bars, worth millions of pounds, had been found stashed in a fuel tanker.
He described the moment he set eyes on the “unbelievable” amount of bars – and how he even asked to take one for himself.
“The petrol tanker was half full and at first I thought it wasn’t real gold. It was unbelievable. How could someone have this amount of gold in a fuel tanker,” he said.
“I said jokingly, can I have one of those?, because there were thousands. They weighed about 12kg each and they were really heavy. I ended up pleading with them!” Tony said.
Tony estimates the gold bars were worth over $25 million dollars per pallet.
“Saddam had a lot of stuff scattered around. In his mansions they found hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The two soldiers had been looking for a chainsaw to cut down a tree. Instead they had stumbled across $320 million in cash. Within a few days, that total had risen to $780 million: the secret hoards of the privileged members of Saddam’s fallen regime.
The dollars were crisp and ready to use. The temptation was obvious.”
More wars of aggression will befall the rest of the world if the Americans are stupid enough to elect a Hillary Clinton to the White House, as the FBI refuses to indict her in spite of the damning evidence of wrongdoings and countless body bags, in much the same way as the ICC absolves Tony Blair.
You can actually participate in the global efforts to cripple the Deep State organized criminal cabal's ability for genocide, while enjoying healthcare freedom at the same time, by boycotting Big Pharma for good.