Fulford MisSteps, Karen Hudes MisSpeaks

This is a very disturbing article to which we are reconsidering our subscription to Fulford’s weekly reports on GeoPolitics, in this most crucial times.

Perhaps, this would explain the inconsistencies of Ben Fulford’s stand regarding the Vatican’s role post mortem. Remember, the White Dragon Society, to which he is acting as the spokesman, made a deal with the P2 Freemasons through Leo Zagami, for a peaceful resolution.

Keenan, in past videos, was not happy with the BRICS alternative bank as just another World Bank.

Also, the One People Public’s Trust [OPPT] was also dismissed by the Keenan Group as another cabalistic attempt to usurp control of the Collateral Accounts.

We have raised the alarm so many times in the past of a possible infiltration by the Jesuits within the ranks of the revolutionaries and reformists.

Once freed from Cabalists’ control, the Collateral Accounts will be channeled by the Keenan Group through non-government organizations and not through the governments, i.e. corporations, for redevelopment purposes and elimination of global poverty.

As far as we, in the Philippines are concern, we want  to finally recover the 600,000 kgs. of pure gold, mined from our own land and looted from our Bangko Sentral, during the time of Ferdinand Marcos and earlier, by the Jesuits.

misssteps

NEIL KEENAN UPDATE: NFK SETS THE RECORD STRAIGHT AS KAREN HUDES “MIS-SPEAKS” AND BEN FULFORD MISSTEPS

Posted on September 19, 2013

Ø Neil Keenan aggressively moves to confront Benjamin Fulford’s misrepresentation of the Monaco Accords in an online dialogue with World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes

Ø Fulford goes fishing – who will cash his notes? Not Neil Keenan, who knows an illegal move when he sees it

Ø Karen Hudes steps outside her area of expertise – makes major gaffe on Monaco

Ø Who is M1? Not the cabal-appointed and long-dead Ferdinand Marcos…

Ø Sukarno was chosen by the nations – Marcos was appointed by the cabal

Ø Cracks in the freedom movement? No. Just the guy in the driver’s seat setting the record straight

by Michael Henry Dunn

September 18, 2013 – Yesterday’s post on this site (in which Neil Keenan personally exposed the cabal’s vulnerability by displaying explosive incriminating documents) shook the banksters’ cage in a way they have probably not experienced since the fall of Atlantis. Today Keenan’s sources report furious in-fighting among the corrupt oligarchs as the free world closes in on our soon-to-be-former oppressors. But this bold move has also provoked “friendly fire” from within the ranks of the freedom movement as competing scenarios jockey for position over control of the vast assets in the Global Collateral Accounts. This is expected. What is not expected is that an important figure like Benjamin Fulford would deliberately misrepresent the nature and documented history of the Monaco Accords of 2011 in an apparent attempt to persuade World Bank whistle-blower Karen Hudes to support what can only be called a hare-brained (and likely illegal) move to cash in a trillion dollars in Federal Reserve notes (to which he has no legal claim), in order to set up an environmental restoration fund to be controlled by – yes, he really said it – the Vatican, and prominent Agenda 21 proponent Jeffrey Sachs.

Karen Hudes, a twenty-year veteran legal counsel in the cabal-controlled World Bank (who has courageously come forward to expose the World Bank’s corruption), is having nothing to do with Fulford’s highly suspect plan, dismissing the proposal as “not in the cards.” But Hudes then commits a serious misstep herself – one of several in regard to Neil Keenan and his allies – and displays disturbing ignorance regarding the nature and purpose of the Monaco meeting in the fall of 2011 (and Mr. Keenan’s crucial role in it), which resulted in an accord among the non-aligned nations – now 178 countries – to regain control of the Global Accounts.

Competing scenarios are one thing. Moves to hand the Global Accounts back to the cabal in the guise of the Vatican — and to put a key globalist in charge of environmental restoration — are another. And the misstatements by Ms. Hudes cannot be allowed to go uncorrected either.

In a blog exchange on the Ascension with Earth site, Fulford addressed the following request to Karen Hudes:

“I would really like to hear her take on Neil Keenan and his activities. He claims to have been at a Monaco meeting a few years ago with many finance ministers and that he runs some kind of BRICS alliance. Somebody linked to the Rockefeller family also told me that such a meeting took place. Can she confirm this or was this some elaborate fiction designed to muddy the waters?”

This was a foolish move by Benjamin. He knows full well the truth of the Monaco Accords. He knows full well that Neil was there. Keenan’s lawyer can testify to Keenan’s presence. And Benjamin Fulford ought to know that Keenan’s trillion-dollar lawsuit against the cabal was the triggering event that led to the global gathering (the Rockefellers certainly know the meeting took place, as their attempt to crash the gathering was firmly rebuffed. Cabal black helicopters buzzed the yacht as it moved out into the Mediterranean, but the oligarchs were not allowed at the table).

After pretending to question things he knows to be true, Fulford then goes on to make his stunning proposal:

“Also ask her if she is willing to support my group’s plan to cash about $1 trillion worth of historical bonds in order to finance a massive development and environmental protection campaign. My personal candidate for running this campaign would be Jeffrey Sachs.”

Jeffrey Sachs is a distinguished economist who is closely identified with the globalist agenda – special adviser to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon on the “Millenium Development Goals.” Is Benjamin serious? Fulford also advocates bringing the Vatican into the picture to manage the Global Accounts (pause here to retrieve jaw from floor).

And we can be forgiven for wondering why Fulford would want to direct funding and attention to environmental restoration (shepherded by an obvious cabal wolf), which, while crucial, can only come after we free ourselves of cabal domination, free the Accounts, and restore the U.S. to its founding documents. I’m not saying that Mr. Fulford is consciously working for the cabal, but they will clearly be pleased with these latest moves on his part.

This begs the question of why Fulford would misstep so badly. It is clear enough to Neil Keenan. Fulford went fishing for support from Hudes for his illegal and strange scheme to cash notes to which he has no claim, and was willing to throw doubt on Keenan if it could gain him the ear of Ms. Hudes. Ms. Hudes was apparently Fulford’s last resort, as he had failed in his approaches to various others parties. Mr. Keenan informed this writer that Fulford approached him first, attempting to persuade Neil to sign off on cashing this rumored $1 trillion in Federal Reserve Notes. With characteristic bluntness, Keenan replied, “Yeah, I’ll send you money, Benjamin. Commissary money to buy cigarettes in prison if you try to pull off that scheme.” As to Fulford’s pretended ignorance regarding Neil Keenan and the Monaco meeting, all one has to do is look at Ben Fulford’s statement (above) and realize that Benjamin himself states that he had made contact with a Rockefeller member who confirmed such a meeting took place. Therefore, why would he call Karen after having received confirmation from a Rockefeller family member? Could it be that he was really looking to get that box cashed?

Fulford claimed to have the support of the U.S., Russia, China, the Vatican, and Queen Elizabeth II….but he needed Keenan’s signature to complete the deal.

Flattery will get you nowhere, Ben. Neil knows full well that only the depositors – the actual historic owners of the assets – can legally sign off on moving any notes or assets, and only in the person of a legally elected (elected by the nations, not appointed by the cabal) Monetary Controller, or M1. Keenan turned Fulford down flat, whereupon Benjamin went to various Global Account wannabes, such as the fraudulent OITC, the now-disbanded sham of the OPPT, and finally Ms. Hudes. And if he needed to publicly cast aspersions on Keenan – feigning doubt about the Monaco meeting, and floating the idea that it all might be “an elaborate fiction designed to muddy the waters” – then that’s what he’d attempt to do.

It is perhaps time to reveal some important facts regarding Fulford’s sources. This writer has sat at Neil Keenan’s side in his hotel suite in Jakarta for several of Mr. Fulford’s Sunday evening Skype calls. I was introduced to Ben, and have always thought highly of him – even when a good half of his “intel” appeared to be wildly erratic – because he has displayed a gutsy determination to expose the cabal and help free the planet, even at grave personal risk. Mr. Fulford makes his living from his newsletter subscriptions – and there’s nothing wrong with that. And his newsletter comes out on Monday. So come Sunday evening, he would often find himself in need of an eye-catching story to keep his subscribers and hopefully procure an increase.

And so he would call Neil Keenan. And Mr. Keenan would give him news on inside developments. Sometimes. And sometimes not. Mr. Fulford displayed a troubling tendency to turn on his own sources, as when he outed the identity of a key intelligence contact from Keenan who had been instrumental in saving Fulford’s life after a death threat.

Playing off one source against another for personal advantage is a risky move in this perilous game.

I do not doubt that Benjamin Fulford has hundreds of other sources. He is a longtime professional journalist with deep contacts throughout Asia, and he has made important contributions to the exposure of the cabal. How much solid intelligence those sources are able to give him about the unfolding story of the Global Accounts is an open question. I can tell you I observed a direct relationship between the intel Neil Keenan would occasionally share with Benjamin, and the stories that would appear on his blog the next day.

It’s a really bad idea to bite the hand that feeds you, Ben. Unless you’ve decided the loss is worth the prize?

And just exactly what is that prize? What’s in this for Ben? Cashing in Federal Reserve notes to which he has no claim?

As for this outrageous notion of bringing in the Vatican, it is worth noting, perhaps, that it was Mr. Fulford who first suggested to Neil Keenan the idea of making Vatican financial insider Daniele del Bosco the designated custodian of $144.5 billion in FRNs entrusted to Keenan by the Dragon Family.

We all know what happened to those notes. Del Bosco absconded with them. I expect Mr. Keenan will remember this fact when taking in the news of Fulford’s advocacy of making the corruption-riddled Vatican the guardian of humanity’s stolen heritage. “Fool me once…” I believe the saying goes.

As for Ms. Hudes, there is an urgent need to clarify her misstatements in regard to the Monaco meeting and the subsequent Accords.

Ms. Hudes was not there, as Western G7 powers were deliberately kept out – the World Bank as a notorious cabal institution was definitely not on the invitation list. China is the primary depositor of the assets in the Accounts, and the entire non-aligned world has seen the European-American-controlled cabal hijack the assets twice in the last sixty years. The Monaco meeting triggered the momentum towards the current showdown with the cabal.

In response to Fulford’s proposal, Karen Hudes gave the following reply:

The Vatican/Chinese bankster coalition you are pushing is not in the cards. Instead, what is happening is that the US through a grassroots movement assisted by local sheriffs, US marshals, in collaboration with the white hats in the Pentagon and the rest of the US’ allies are calling for the rule of law. It is this framework that will be calling the shots. There was a 95% likelihood that this would happen ever since the World Bank whistleblowers got through to the UK Parliament. This article explains http://www.larsschall.com/2013/05/08/governance-issues-at-the-world-bank-a-security-risk-to-the-world-order/

This statement refers to a well-known scenario unfolding within the American militia movement (as chronicled online by prominent spokesman Drake Bailey) in collaboration with patriotic elements in the Pentagon for restoring the U.S. Constitution – once the proper legal framework is in place. The role Hudes credits to the “World Bank whistle-blowers” as the key movers in making this happen is questionable – Neil Keenan certainly had something to do with it – but we’ll let that go, other than to observe that Ms. Hudes is a Joanie-come-lately to the freedom movement, and has apparently decided to attempt to co-opt it and shepherd it back to the cabal’s corrupt and discredited global domination structures, such as the World Bank and the IMF.

Hudes goes on to say:

The Monaco meeting was a bogus attempt to ignore the succession laws governing Marcos’ signature authority and rests upon a legal opinion from the US Treasury that is not worth the paper its written on. This opinion, together with Treasury’s audit of Germany’s gold, will go the way of the fiat currencies See http://beforeitsnews.com/new-world-order/2013/09/recovering-buried-gold-in-the-philippines-and-indonesia-chinese-bankers-and-corrupt-federal-government-120.html Mr. Fulford’s attempt to move from the OITC to the Vatican is a leap from the frying pan to the fire.

[more here]

The long-dead Ferdinand Marcos had nothing to do with the Monaco meeting, and the Monaco meeting had nothing to do with “an opinion from the U.S. Treasury” – especially considering that the UST assisted in defrauding the nations present at the meeting for nearly a hundred years. If Ms. Hudes is willing to present this “legal opinion” from UST and explain what it had to do with the Monaco gathering’s determination to throw off Fed and UST control, that would be helpful. As to what the Treasury’s audit of Germany’s gold has to do with any of this, we are left in the dark. Ferdinand Marcos was never “M1” or “monetary controller” – he was appointed but never elected. It was the fraudulent appointment of Marcos by the cabal that violated the succession laws. Only President Sukarno of Indonesia held that role, as he was chosen by the nations of the world after World War II. The succession laws were not ignored at Monaco. No successor was chosen – the gathering did not pretend to have the power to do that.

The nations of the world chose Sukarno – and since his passing the principal Asian depositors have assigned the role of M1 to a likely successor, whose identity remains undisclosed. The official and legal election of a future “M1” – and even perhaps the nature of that role – is yet to be determined. The first priority is to unite behind the move to free the Accounts and defeat the cabal. The nations can then peacefully sort out how to move the Accounts into action to heal the world.

Ms. Hudes goes on to say:

“I am bringing the rule of law to bear so that the members of the Bretton Woods institutions can get down to brass tacks and consider all proposals transparently, including the $1 trillion in historical bonds that Mr. Fulford is referring to. Jeffrey Sachs, or any other individual, or committee, or smoke screen, only diverts, delays, and brings the world closer to permanent backwardation in gold. If Mr. Fulford wants to continue this dialogue, I invite him to email me directly.”

Well, it might be more accurate to say that the nations of the world are bringing the rule of law to bear. Ms. Hudes’ contributions have been courageous and crucial, but we have not exactly placed our fate in her hands. As a lawyer, Ms. Hudes should know that the statement “I am bringing the rule of law” is a contradiction of the nature of law itself, which is by definition a communal, not a dictatorial reality. And placing the Accounts into the hands of “the Bretton Woods institutions” – i.e., the cabal-created and cabal-controlled World Bank, the BIS, the IMF, and the UN – is not a plan the world will be eager to embrace. An independent world court endorsed, recognized, and given jurisdiction by the 178 nations behind the Monaco Accords is more likely to serve the cause of freedom and peaceful resolution.

It would also be wise for Ms. Hudes to reconsider how to handle communication with highly-placed contacts provided by Mr. Keenan. An attempt to go around Keenan to a highly influential spokesman for the allied Asian families with historical claims to the majority of assets in the Global Accounts backfired badly for Ms. Hudes. The gentleman in question immediately informed Mr. Keenan, and Ms. Hudes has now burned that bridge. These clumsy end-around moves generate distrust, as do the bullying tactics she employed in a conversation with Keenan’s trusted associate, Jean Haines, who had to endure a one-sided scream-down from Ms. Hudes, until Mr. Keenan intervened. It is difficult to credit Ms. Hudes’ recent claims to represent the 178 nation consortium, as global support of that kind cannot be won by such clumsy means. Ms. Hudes represents only Ms. Hudes, and as she no longer works at the World Bank, she has a constituency of one. She now claims in a recent interview with Fulford that she no longer works with Keenan. The truth is that Neil Keenan cut off all contact with Ms. Hudes – as did the influential S.C. Chaing and Keenan’s network of other allies due to her attempt to do a dishonest end-run around Keenan and his team.

There is a crucial need for clear and respectful communication in this pivotal moment. We’ve been doing our best to clear the clutter, but apparently there is still some out there.

And we need not squabble over the wealth of the planet. The astonishing truth is that there is abundance beyond imagining. We simply need to unite as one human family, disarm the oppressors, and heal our world.

Michael Henry Dunn

Neil, with his terrific disk jockey skills, shares this song with us:

We have just released the Second Edition of Towards Healthcare Emancipation eBook. The proceeds from this book will be used to fund our next project, Towards Energy Emancipation.

The aim is to make the subject of free energy more understandable for the layman so that anybody could replicate and install his own power plant and be completely living off-grid.

If you haven’t done so, please like our FB page to encourage others to learn more about our work.

Thank you very much for your valuable support.

Health & Medicine - Top Blogs Philippines

2 thoughts on “Fulford MisSteps, Karen Hudes MisSpeaks”

  1. It never helps that all of you above were working close in hand together now there is heat going on amongst yourselves, making some people were thinking for the best but could have been wrong but all 3 of you must come together on all dialogue and continue ‘together’ to come to solutions!! When this happens it shows directly to the Cabal a weakness and this is exactly what they want is for all of you to fight!! Get those emails out to each other and settle this infighting and stick together on all issues and resolve them!! This does not make all of you look good ‘fix all of this amongst yourselves and please get things back in harmony now’ Blesses together we can all make this work but not by fighting…Blesses Aidan G Walsh…

  2. Ok. so, someone knows more than Fulford and Hudes about global accounts. So, let me ask several questions related to this. I don’t see any email address.

    1. Is cabal a Vatican thing or a Jew thing? (in any case satanist, but which one?)

    2. Is there a Gnostic Illuminati (which is good) separate from Illuminati (which is bad/cabal) ?

    3. Are homo capensis species still living on earth as K. Hudes/ Ed. Spencer claim? I’m totally convinced they lived here (at least in Egypt) in the past 20,000 years. If the answer is yes, why should people in cabal let them control the world?

    4. Is global reset coing soon? Can reset come before locating and controlling gold in global accounts (control by US. Russia. China can be enough.)

    5. Is real Putin dead? If so, is current duplicate a good leader or a cabal puppet (as Fulford claim)?

    6. Is China a cabal puppet as Hudes claims?

    7. Why didn’t US steal gold at those accounts when US had nukes and Soviets didn’t (shortly after 1945)? It would be an easy job?

    8. Why did both Jose Rizal (good man according to Hudes) and Yamashita (bad general who stole gold) both burry gold in Phillippines. How can there be such a coincidence.

    9. What is the relation between White Dragon gold, and gold stolen from east asia in ww2. If White Dragons are chinese, their gold would be stolen by Japanese army. If they are Japanese, is their gold stolen from China and the rest of Asia?

We do appreciate sensible comments...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.