Is the Trump Administration Really Anti-Establishment?

Donald Trump has put the mainstream media, and ex-President Obama, on the defensive. That’s the good news.

The bad news is: the US foreign policy remains the same as far as the movement of military assets in many regions around the world is concerned.

In fact, the same policy is even dwarfing Obama’s indecision in places like Syria, or in the immediate vicinity of Iran, China and Russia, where the Pentagon has augmented its forces by the hundreds, or thousands, of troops and equipment, depending on the location.

Just recently, the Pentagon deployed B-52 bombers, 400 airmen for Iraq and Syria campaign. But, only three days ago, Syrian President Assad had already made it clear that all those forces that were not invited to Syria are invaders.

So, why would Trump send these war materiel to Syria, South Korea, and near the Russian borders, if indeed the US president is any different than his predecessors?

Even the new US Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, is still parroting the same old “Never trust Russia” song, like her predecessor Samantha Power did.

The way we see it, while Obama’s policy in Syria is to prolong the agony of the Syrians by dragging on its military operations against the CIA-trained terrorists in one hand, and dropping aerial bombs against Syrian military positions like in Idlib, which killed about 80 armed Syrian personnel and destroying critical supply infrastructures, on the other,

… the incumbent Trump administration is executing a more decisive military operations against the terrorists in Raqqa, the de facto Daesh capital in Syria, in order to gain control of some of the territory, post-Daesh.

In the process, a US-friendly Kurdish minority would be put in charge in Raqqa, or a portion thereof, when it is fully liberated from Daesh, just like what the US did in Berlin after the Russians defeated the Nazis there, sending Adolf Hitler in hiding for the rest of his life.

Whether this is what the Two Towers’ primordial goal everywhere they both go, is something that we can only speculate on, bearing in mind that the G7 countries today still continue to produce arms and ammunitions for the global consumers, even when they make antagonistic rhetorics against one another.

Another interesting point to consider is the early departure of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn which arrested a more proactive, yet peaceful reengagement with Russia.

NSA Michael Flynn and Donal Trump.
NSA Michael Flynn and Donal Trump.

Yet, we know that the man is fiercely anti-Iran — a staunch Russian ally in the Middle East.

Are we to believe that all of these people are not sharing the same sources of information about other countries, hence the differences of opinions about them?

Or, are they just acting from a given script which sustains the atmosphere of global conflict without really going into a full blown war, to bleed the common man out of the fruits of his toil?

Now that Mike Flynn is out of the picture, from whom does Trump get his foreign and domestic policy advice from?

Aside from the slew of military generals surrounding The Donald, it’s Steve Bannon, who is the supposed “intellectual force” behind Trump’s agenda. But…

Who is Trump’s Chief Strategist Steve Bannon?

“Steve Bannon has been propelled over the last year from fringe media outlier to top propagandist of the U.S. Empire as Trump’s Chief Strategist.

From his Wall Street roots and apocalyptic film career to his cultivation of alt-right bigots at Breitbart News, Abby Martin exposes Bannon’s true character in this explosive documentary.

Dissection of Bannon’s ideology of “economic nationalism” and desire to “Make America Great Again” reveals the danger of his hand in Trump’s agenda.” – TeleSUR

So, is the Trump administration really anti-establishment?

Just because it is standing up against the offensives of the Deep State doesn’t really mean it’s anti-establishment, because the latter is more than just a co-opted mass media and a conscripted CIA.

The military industrial complex, and the entire financial system which is very excited in seeing how its portfolio begun picking up once again, are still standing like never before. They haven’t changed management yet, no matter what we’ve heard from the grapevine.

No, the Trump administration is not purely anti-establishment. He’s just a change in approach and strategy to the growing mass awakening that has since engulfed the planet owing to the interconnectivity of the internet.

Once again, they are one step ahead, and we are mere spectators, still.

Sadly, that’s all our fault.

5 thoughts on “Is the Trump Administration Really Anti-Establishment?”

  1. Realistically you have accept that Trump is a Nationalist in opposition to the Globalists.His credentials & his support from the Masons & other covert groups are the only way we can see the end of these KM criminals. You can’t fight psychopathic mass murderers with a wooden spoon or the Human Rights act.

  2. At 10;20 straight after they mentioned “Hitler” that they presumed was the door to use racist words like “White Men” That happens ? ‘DELETE”

  3. Like many I voted for Pres. Trump because of these horrible foreign invasions (slaughters) with our tax dollar…and because of the awful working conditions in sweatshops and slavery. I want my country to be honorable. If he wants to be a Conquistador for Coke and Exxon, we have our eyes and ears on him. The Vietnam generation is beginning to sense Robert McNamara and Spellman’s ghosts.
    There is a path to honor and a just prosperity…Jesus Christ showed us.


  4. 3-9-2017 Did ConAir Kristine Marcy JABS McVeigh? [1:06:19]
    Abel Danger | Mar 9, 2017
    Comment: U.S. Marine Field McConnell mentions Warren Buffett’s role in 9/11 and Ted Gunderson’s role in the Franklin Boys’ Town Nebraska Cover-Up.
    [29:47] Field McConnell: Once the United States and the world realize that it is Abel Danger that forced the elimination of global pedophilia as a control mechanism, then perhaps the value of those books [authored by him] may go up. [30:03]


    Can Trump Stop Serco Fake News Crashes On Bridge Of Demon ICE For Marcy 8a Forfeiture Fund? [57:28]
    Abel Danger | Mar 2, 2017
    [20:28] Comment: Field McConnell: (honey pot) … or any G.H.W. Bush’s 12- to 14-year old males he had sent on U.S. Airforce airplanes from Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska [Boys’ Town] to Andrews AFB in Clintonville, Maryland. And what they were doing is bringing young boys in to pleasure homosexual pedophiles including but not limited to Henry Kissinger, G.H.W. Bush and Warren Buffett. [20:57]

    http://www.abeldanger.net/2016/12/2857-has-trump-linked-serco-911-way.html
    Monday, December 12, 2016
    #2857: Has Trump Linked Serco 9/11 Way Points To Goldman Liquidation, Marcy Insurrection?
    United States Marine Field McConnell
    Plum City Online – (AbelDanger.net)
    1. Abel Danger (AD) has explained to Donald Trump how Serco appears to have used ad hoc way points during the Boeing hijacks on 9/11 to link Goldman Sachs liquidators at the Offutt Air Force Base to a group of 8(a) insurrectionists allegedly funded by former SBA Chief Operating Officer Kristine Marcy and her accelerated loan guarantee program.
    2. AD alleges that Marcy – charter founder of the all-powerful Senior Executive Service in 1979 – triggered an interest payment default on September 10, 2001 for the SBA’s Debenture SBIC 2001-10 A and allowed the loan underwriter and Serco shareholder Goldman Sachs to liquidate enemy assets during 8(a) insurrectionist war games on 9/11.

    “What were 300 Goldman Sachs employees doing at Offutt AFB with Warren Buffet when the President landed on the morning of 9/11?
    Deleted http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin…gi?read=158101
    Posted By: Rayelan Date: Friday, 16-Oct-2009 15:55:22″
    Note: According to the Abel Danger private military intelligence team, 300 Goldman Sachs employees and Warren Buffett were at Offutt AFB underground facility early on 9/11/2001 to watch “the biggest live mass snuff film in human history,” and Warren Buffett was one of the biggest funders of the 9/11/2001 war game exercise that went rogue by design, along with Goldman Sachs.

    “In a commercial that ran in the closing days of the campaign, Mr. Trump warned about “a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities.” The face of Goldman’s chief executive, Lloyd C. Blankfein — Mr. Cohn’s longtime friend and collaborator — was among the images that flashed ominously on the screen.

    And Mr. Trump criticized both Hillary Clinton and a primary opponent, Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, over their ties to the investment bank. “I know the guys at Goldman Sachs,” Mr. Trump said at one primary debate. “They have total, total control” over Mr. Cruz, he said. “Just like they have total control over Hillary Clinton.”

    Since his election, however, Mr. Trump has stocked his future cabinet with a number of Goldman alumni, including Mr. Mnuchin, a hedge fund manager and a former Goldman trader, and Stephen K. Bannon, a former Goldman banker who is now Mr. Trump’s chief strategist.

We do appreciate sensible comments...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s