China Drops the 25-year Anchor in Israeli Haifa Port

Even when China’s Belt and Road Initiative has been discussed widely in mainstream media nowadays, still this news has sent shockwaves across continents. The port of Haifa will be under the full control of a Chinese company from 2021 through 2046.
Some consider this as proof that China is actually under the Rothschild dynasty’s control, as the State of Israel is.
Superimposing this possibility in the recent incident involving four Israeli fighter jets using the Russian Ilyushin IL-20 recon plane as a cover that would then receive Syrian air defense’s timely respond that resulted in the deaths of 15 Russian personnel on-board from the same Russian made S-200 missiles being used by Syrians, only suggest that Russia and its allies on one hand, and US-UK-France on the other, are just using Syria as a playground, i.e. a theater of simulated war,  for advancing their respective interests.
Remember, every state needs to create and sustain the perceived rationale for their own existence. When every individual has the capacity and enough resources to be self-reliant, governments will no longer have reasons to exist. So, we need to have conflicts from time to time so that government must be there to “protect us from that possibility of having to deal with external threats.”
Having said that, it is equally true that Western economies are experiencing a financial meltdown, although most of the population there has not realized it yet, and China’s entry into their respective economies are being welcomed by their respective governments, US-dependent Israel included, even when some quarters are raising security concerns. Still, the question must be asked, why this is happening at all in the most highly priced territory of the Vatican?

Chinese company is planning to take over management of Israel’s Haifa port as Beijing continues to advance its global influence in the form of economic projects and big commercial deals.
The Haifa port sits close to the hub of the Israeli navy base that is reportedly home to the country’s nuclear-capable submarine force, according to The Times of Israel. Israeli critics are calling for an investigation into potential security issues posed by the Chinese presence along the country’s Mediterranean coast.
At the University of Haifa’s Workshop on Future of Maritime Security in the Eastern Mediterranean conference at the end of August, Shaul Chorev, reservist brigadier general of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), former navy chief of staff, and chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, said a new mechanism was required to keep an eye on Chinese investments in Israel.
According to a summary document of the meeting, sent to Newsweek by Chorev, one of the key concerns among those present was that the Chinese Haifa contract could “limit or preclude” regional cooperation with the U.S. Navy, which has become ever more valuable due to political developments in the Middle East.
The Shanghai International Port Group’s management of the newly expanded Haifa port is due to be inaugurated in 2021, noted Ynet, and the contract will run for 25 years. Another Chinese firm won a contract to build a new port in the southern Israeli city of Ashdod, reported Haaretz.
But, as the August conference noted, this project also has political and military dimensions. Chorev and his colleagues warned that Israel lacked a process to analyze economic investments for its national security implications, and must rapidly develop one.
China has been hard at work creating a network of infrastructure to extend its economic reach around the globe. Its mammoth Belt and Road Initiative hopes to establish a 21st-century Silk Road by 2049. Beijing will invest as much as $8 trillion in the undertaking, said the Center for Strategic and International studies.

Who can refuse part of that $8 trillion blood infusion to one’s economy right now?
Just to provide enough context, this development did not happen overnight. In 2016, The Institute for National Security Studies of Tel Aviv University reported in 2016 that:

In the past few years, Israel granted two Chinese firms major concessions in its two principal ports on the Mediterranean cost – Haifa and Ashdod. These add to a growing Chinese maritime presence in the East Mediterranean, Egypt, Greece, and Turkey, in what seems to be a move to facilitate China’s growing trade with Europe. The question arises whether the Chinese enterprise is motivated purely by economic reasoning. Or, might there be long term strategic thinking behind these efforts? This article surveys China’s maritime expansion in the region and questions whether Israel has given sufficient thought to strategic considerations beyond the economic benefits.

This should give the Chinese government a considerable control over the economic trajectory of the Rothschild territory, and may provide a huge leverage on the impending establishment of a two-state compromise between the Khazarian Jews and Palestinians.
Early on, we have laid out the supposed plan of the Eastern Alliance to establish a multipolar world to counter the hegemon that’s been perpetrating endless wars of plunder across the Eurasian continent. Incorporating Israel’s Haifa Port into the Belt and Road economic network could be part of the compromise that needs to be done so that Israel is assured of survival once the Deep State is finally removed from power.
That’s the only explanation why the US presence in Israel must be set aside.

President Xi Jinping has been vocal in his push for what he called the “military civilian integration policy,’ by which the leader intends to combine “the ideas, decisions and plans of military and civilian integration” in “all fields of national economic development and defense building.”
In that light, the commercial contract for the Haifa port would theoretically give the Chinese military a usable facility in the Mediterranean along one of the world’s most vital trade arteries.
The deal could affect the relationship between the U.S. and the IDF. Retired Admiral Gary Roughead, the former chief of naval operations, said he was in favor of increased Israeli-U.S. cooperation generally, but a Chinese-run port in Haifa meant American ships could not regularly use the Israeli naval base nearby.
According to the summary provided by Chorev, Roughead explained, “The Chinese port operators will be able to monitor closely U.S. ship movements, be aware of maintenance activity and could have access to equipment moving to and from repair sites and interact freely with our crews over protracted periods.
“Significantly, the information systems and new infrastructure integral to the ports and the likelihood of information and electronic surveillance systems jeopardize U.S. information and cybersecurity,” he continued. “These factors might not preclude brief port visits, but it would preclude homeporting and other protracted projects and initiatives.”
The U.S. Navy has been gradually pivoting, noted Taylor & Francis, from the European theater and Middle East to the Persian Gulf and Asia, particularly because of the challenge posed by an increasingly powerful China. Europe is no longer the ultimate focus of American foreign policy.

This also indicates the waning power of the Deep State in the realm of military and finance. Remember, it used to be an exclusive topic of a few alternative sites, but the highly coordinated dollar dumping is now undeniable. Even Newsweek above has been very silent about the ongoing anti-Deep State financial attack until today when clearly. allowing China’s encroachment is the only option left.
The great irony here is that therre’s a report that it would be Israel that would provide the escape route for the defeated ISIS militants in Syria, and where should they’d be sent?
To Xinjang Province border of China where Uyghur militants are already holding up.
In short, the impending final showdown in Idlib will provide the Chinese the great opportunity to slaughter the armed pawns in the game, while the West and Israel can start forgetting them, because all of this planned escape route will be just for the latter’s comfort.

You can actually participate in the global efforts to cripple the Deep State organized criminal cabal's ability for genocide, while enjoying healthcare freedom at the same time, by boycotting Big Pharma for good.

11 thoughts on “China Drops the 25-year Anchor in Israeli Haifa Port”

  1. Yep, I agree Kenneth, they were punished severely during the opium wars, a lesson that they will not forget for a long, long time. As I said much earlier that they shifted a lot of money in 2007/2008 during the time the west took a dip the east expanded. This is all preplanned so that people worry that the Chinese will take their jobs, homes etc… Yes more fear! So the Chinese are now to build a port or two for 8 trillion. Either the US$ has slid a long way down or there is going to be very complex building and/or a marine command centre that will be second to none.

  2. Some consider this as proof that China is actually under the Rothschild dynasty’s control, as the State of Israel is. This statement is BULLSHIT and only uninformed idiots could come up with it. when I read about China in these Blogs and read the comments it is obvious a lot of people need to spend a lot of time learning the Truth instead of at the keyboard showing how dumb they are and full of shit.

    1. Perhaps point those so called dumb keyboard people to relevant sites or links that say otherwise. I for one would like to know how China’s economy grew so quickly in 2007/2008 when the rest of the world slumped! Just think of the market logistics involved too, these markets were set up by the colonisers of this world. Countries just don’t buy from any country they choose to especially if they have loans from the IMF,WB etc to pay back.

  3. Wow!…I cannot believe there are so MANY “Naive” people making post about matters THEY Know so Little about…an dare still trying to SELL this horrific “Financial System” to the Planet.
    I already KNOW about the FAKE “HIS-Story” that’s WAS presented through out time LONG AGO….And it is Full of LIES about EVERYTHING.
    You keep posting material as if EVERYONE is NAIVE about “OUR-STORY”, which is the REAL TRUTH.
    Therefor You are either PART of the Luciferian/Satanic “System” our are so NAIVE as to be like Dumb animal “Playing on a Freeway” just Before RUSH HOUR.
    Remember something…YOUR “TIME IS UP”!
    I KNOW ALL about CHINA’S Actual STORY…and the REST of “MAN-Kind’s” HIS-STORY.

  4. China Will Not Attack The Dollar Directly, But Is Surrounding It For Death Knell…
    US allies would then need to choose between the two: the collapsing dollar, with no backing to shore it up, or a Gold-backed renminbi.
    Many countries outside the US see the US approach to diplomacy as: Bluster and Intimidate.
    Whilst, typically, US diplomats wear suits and appear businesslike in their manner, their message is often considerably different. If the US states what it wants from another country and that country then chooses to decline, the response by the US is often an “in your face” approach not unlike that associated with the image of a wild-West sheriff.
    The message received from the US is often along the lines of, “We’ve decided what your role in the world should be, so get with the program or you’ll feel our boot on your neck.”
    It should be said that it makes no difference to the country on the receiving end whether it is a left boot or a right boot; whether the current US president is a democrat or republican is of no consequence. The country feels the boot equally, whichever party is in power. And the message and the objectives remain the same, regardless of which party is presently in control.
    As offensive and reprehensible as this approach is, the countries of the world often simply cave in to such behavior. They understand that if a country’s leader were to decide to, say, cease to trade in US dollars, his country might be attacked for trumped-up reasons and the leader could end up in a pine box. (This approach has been employed on more than one occasion in recent years.)
    The threat from the US is therefore very real.
    But presumably, this bullying approach would be less effective if attempted against one of the world’s more powerful countries. If, for example, the US were to find itself in a situation such as the present one with China, in which the US appeared to be losing its battle over the dollar’s power as the world’s reserve currency, what would occur? Would the US attempt to bully China? And if the ploy failed, would the US draw its six-guns and fire off a few rounds in the air for emphasis?
    And if the above were to take place, what would the Chinese reaction be? Would they retaliate in a similar manner—the diplomatic equivalent of an American baseball player butting chests with an umpire—each one childishly seeking to win through sheer bluster?
    Here, it would be useful to consider Chinese culture. Traditionally, bluster and braggadocio are not consistent with Chinese behavior. The Chinese tend to take a quieter, more thoughtful approach, one that employs patience and careful timing.
    It might be useful to consider the traditional game of Wéiqí (aka Go), a board game that was first played in China thousands of years ago and is still popular to this day.
    In Wéiqí, the objective is to place the playing pieces on the board one at a time, in an effort to surround the pieces of the opponent. (Once the pieces are surrounded, they are considered taken.) Of interest is that a common tactic is to avoid being obvious in the effort to surround the opponent’s pieces. The greater the subtlety of play, the greater the likelihood of eventual success. In essence, the philosophy is the exact opposite of the US approach. It is one of surrounding the opponent, rather than meeting him head-on.
    The game of Wéiqí is of greater significance in China than, say, Monopoly is in the US. It contains a philosophy that is basic in Chinese thinking. Although this is not a game that is likely to become popular in Las Vegas, it is one that informs Chinese diplomacy.
    Aside from the occasional comment from the Xinhua News Agency suggesting building a “de-Americanized world,” the Chinese have generally kept their cards close to their vest.
    Returning to the question of the dominant currency in the world, the US is unquestionably following its wild-West sheriff approach in demanding that the dollar remain the world’s default currency: taking military action against those who move in another direction.
    Meanwhile, the Chinese have been quietly expanding the power of the renminbi, first by encouraging its use internationally, then working out currency agreements with the BRICS, ASEAN, etc. More recently, they have created agreements with Western countries like Australia and the UK to trade in the renminbi.
    As in a game of Wéiqí, China is not attacking the dollar directly. They are surrounding it, by creating relationships first with their own close allies, then with the US allies. If they continue in this tactic, it is likely that they will complete their ability to trade with all or most of the world in the renminbi, then announce to the US that, in order to continue to buy Chinese sneakers to sell in Walmart, the renminbi must be used.
    At that point, should the US refuse, China would be in a position to say, “You’re an important customer, but if we lose you as a customer, we will still be able to maintain our present relationship with the rest of the world without you.”
    The question would then be whether the US need for Chinese goods is greater than the Chinese need to sell them those goods. There can be no doubt that both countries want the relationship to continue; however, the one who could hold out the longest would be the victor—in essence, a game of economic “chicken.”
    At such a point, the US would be likely to appeal to its allies to step in and side with them. But if the event were timed by the Chinese to coincide with massive inflation of the US dollar, the US allies would then need to choose between the two: the collapsing dollar, with no backing to shore it up, or a gold-backed renminbi.

    1. The UK govern what the US does and what it says period. Because of the debt that USA has amassed and for the simple truths that the Fed reserve are a nasty piece of work are the true reasons why it looks like these entities are coming to an end. They need to reform the chameleon again in a different land. One has to know that the worldwide mineral prices are set in London – period, and although the pound is not viewed as a world currency it can still be exchanged anywhere in the world something which the renminbi cannot momentarily. This move is taking the ‘shock’ out of the collapse of a former monetary system, but the owners have not changed.

    1. Thanks for posting THAT link…I wanted to post it myself, but was in a hurry to leave home for erans that day….I’ve got LOADS of Truths about Many things.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *