Russian authorities are not ruling out terror attack, or other external forces as the cause of yesterday’s flight 7K9268 A321 disaster.
“External forces are the only possible reason of the deadly crash, Kogalymavia officials said Monday. Kogalymavia 7K9268 flight likely suffered substantial damages when it started to fall, officials said.”

Terrorism Not Ruled Out as Potential Cause of A321 Crash – Kremlin

Sputnik

13:10 02.11.2015(updated 14:19 02.11.2015)
“We cannot say what version of a possible cause of the crash will be a basis of the investigation,” Dmitry Peskov said on Monday, replying to a question about whether a terrorist attack could be to blame.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is constantly being briefed with information on the A-321 passenger jet that crashed on Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula over the weekend, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Monday.
He added that at the moment it was “totally wrong” to make preliminary guesses, adding that it was necessary to wait for the first results of the investigation.
Earlier in the day, a top manager with Russian air carrier Kogalymavia said that the company could not rule out a terrorist attack as the possible reason behind its flight 7K9268 crash.
http://sputniknews.com/russia/20151102/1029458544/a321-terrorism-possible.html

Kogalymavia Confirms Crashed Russian Airliner’s Tail Part Was Damaged

Sputnik

On Saturday, Airbus A-321 operated by Russian airline Kogalymavia crashed in the Sinai Peninsula en route from the Egyptian resort city of Sharm El-Sheikh to St. Petersburg. All 224 people on board, including 25 children, were confirmed dead by Russian and Egyptian authorities.
The tragedy has already been named the biggest civil aviation disaster in Russian and Soviet history.
After the tail part of the Airbus A321 plane had sustained damages in 2001, the airliner was fully repaired. The technical condition of the plane was normal, Kogalymavia officials said.
“Before the A321 began falling, it most likely had received considerable damage to its construction that would not allow it to fly. Obviously, due to this, when the catastrophic situation started to unfold, the crew completely lost control over the plane, which would explain why there were no attempts to communicate and report on the emergency situation on board,” the airlines’ deputy general director of technical and production issues, Andrei Averianov, said at a press conference in Moscow.
External forces are the only possible reason of the deadly crash, Kogalymavia officials said Monday. Kogalymavia 7K9268 flight likely suffered substantial damages when it started to fall, officials said.
A passenger plane like the Airbus A321 that crashed over the weekend in the Sinai Peninsula cannot be destroyed in mid-flight because of some technical system failure, the reason for a breakup could only be due to a mechanical impact, the deputy general director of the ill-fated airlines said.
“A plane cannot break up in the air due to some sort of [system] failure. If we exclude any type of fantastic version, then theoretically a plane may break up because of large overloads. The Airbus 320 aircraft is a very reliable plane and has so-called protection in its control, which does not allow for the plane to become overloaded even if there is an error in piloting techniques,” Alexander Smirnov, who is in charge of the company’s flight and production aspects, said.
He said that “the only feasible explanation to the reason for the plane breaking up in mid-air would be a particular action, a mechanical or physical action on the aircraft. I’m not authorized to make any sort of conclusions, but a plane cannot simply disintegrate.”
The Kogalymavia plane’s crew completely lost control over the aircraft as the disaster started to unfold. The Airbus A321 had been in uncontrolled flight as the catastrophe unfolded. However, Kogalymavia excluded human or technical factors as the cause for the deadly crash in Egypt, officials said.
Andrei Averianov said that according to Flight Radar information, he noted that “the plane slowed more than 300 kilometers an hour in less than a minute and simultaneously lost 1.5 kilometers in altitude.”
“A plane cannot fly in this regime, especially a large passenger or cargo aircraft. This means that the plane was in an uncontrollable flight and wasn’t flying, but falling,” Andrianov said.
However, the crashed Russian airliner had passed all necessary tests when entering the Kogalymavia fleet; and the technical condition of the plane was good, the company’s top manager said Monday. The aircraft’s engines were inspected in Moscow on October 26; no problems were found. Moreover, there were no problems with the quality of fuel used by the Russian airliner.
“In regard to fatigued cracks it should be noted that work on its assessment of metal fatigue on airliners is done every five years. We also conducted such work very carefully on this plane and that was in March 2014,” Kogalymavia flight director Alexander Smirnov said during a press conference in Moscow.
The Russian airline does not exclude a terrorist attack or an explosion as reasons behind the 7K9268 flight’s deadly crash, the Kogalymavia deputy director said answering a question regarding the possibility of terrorists downing the A321.
“Let’s wait for the official results of the investigation and for the commission to tell us about its result. I don’t want to speculate [with regard to the cause for the plane crash], it’s not in my competence,” Alexander Smirnov said.
Kogalymavia halted flights over the Sinai Peninsula, said Oksana Golovina, the representative from TH&C Holding, which owns the airlines. There are no doubts that the investigation into the Russian plane crash is objective, officials said.
The company added that videos shared online, which allegedly showed the Russian airliner’s crash in Egypt, were likely fake.
http://sputniknews.com/russia/20151102/1029455702/kogalymavia-tail-part-damaged.html
It seems that the Russian authorities are now laying the predicate of informing the world of what is really going on behind the scenes.