The US Air Force and DARPA would like us to believe that they have stopped using HAARP in Alaska for research and experiment. Even then, we all know that there are other HAARP systems out there in the form of radar communication and surveillance systems that are rigged on top of mobile platforms that are deployable in any international waters around the world.
All they need to do is twist a button to change the frequency to microwave range and increase the frequency modulated [FM] transmission power enough to reach and heat up the atmosphere above the target.
The technology is covered under US Patent 4,686,605 on the “Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or Magnetosphere.”
How does it work?
For those who have no technical appetite, just imagine the same frequency signal used in your microwave oven that cooks your breakfast…
… is directed towards the atmosphere from the tip of the antennas in the array shown below.
Again, the same principle used in the TV, or cell site, broadcast is being used on these HAARP and radar platforms. The only difference in cooking up the sky, as opposed to your breakfast, is that the voltage needed to transmit the same microwave frequency signal is in the range of hundreds of million volts due to the amount of distance that the same signal must traverse between the antenna and the target.
“A typical consumer microwave oven consumes 1,100 W AC and produces 700 W of microwave power, an efficiency of 64%. The other 400 W are dissipated as heat, mostly in the magnetron tube.”
… your government’s HAARP emitter may need 100 billion watts of sheer power, as the patent above has indicated, in order to achieve a specific outcome. There’s no theoretical limit, of course, as to how much ego will play into the process.
What could possibly happen to the preselected region in the atmosphere when enough power is fed to the transmission array?
Understand, that even an increase of just 1 Celsius in the atmospheric temperature is more than enough to initiate a significant weather perturbation. Bear in mind that all gases move from high to low pressure, and gas pressure is directly proportional to its temperature.
In short, if one heats up at least three specific locations in the atmosphere, the common center region having relatively lower pressure than those three heated points will become the eye of the storm. Three competing forces moving towards a common region can only be resolved through a downward spiral rotation, the cooler gases being heavier than the former. Depending on the amount of energy being used, the whole process could take days to develop.
Chemtrailing and cloud seeding could certainly enhance the process far beyond weather manipulation. Notoriously, these maniacs almost always have multiple goals for a single action.
For those who understand frequency modulation, they know that any low frequency signal can be piggybacked into the high frequency radio signal. In short, it is possible to alter human behavior by FM broadcasting brain wave frequencies, to wit:
- Delta waves (below 4 hz) occur during sleep
- Theta waves (4-7 hz) are associated with sleep, deep relaxation (like hypnotic relaxation), and visualization
- Alpha waves (8-13 hz) occur when we are relaxed and calm
- Beta waves (13-38 hz) occur when we are actively thinking, problem-solving, etc.
- The Sensory motor rhythm (or SMR; around 14 hz) was originally discovered to prevent seizure activity in cats. SMR activity seems to link brain and body functions.
- Gamma brain waves (39-100 hz) are involved in higher mental activity and consolidation of information. An interesting study has shown that advanced Tibetan meditators produce higher levels of gamma than non-meditators both before and during meditation.
Those are the “good waves”. But there is also a band of waves that could induce hallucinations. In short, the possibilities are endless using this simple broadcast technology, prompting Tesla to release it to a number of countries after SS George Scherff, Jr., aka George W. Bush, smuggled the electrical plans from the wizard’s laboratory for the Deep State’s own benefit.
Other effects of radio transmission
In order to have an idea of how dangerous this technology really is when under the control of psychopaths controlling the government, we need to look at the World Health Organization article about a few of the possible effects of being exposed to radar [1 megawatt] and radio broadcasts [50 kilowatts]:
Possible health effects
Most studies conducted to date examined health effects other than cancer. They probed into physiological and thermoregulatory responses, behavioural changes and effects such as the induction of lens opacities (cataracts) and adverse reproductive outcome following acute exposure to relatively high levels of RF fields. There are also a number of studies that report non-thermal effects, where no appreciable rise in temperature can be measured.
Cancer-related studies: Many epidemiological studies have addressed possible links between exposure to RF and excess risk of cancer. However, because of differences in the design and execution of these studies, their results are difficult to interpret. A number of national and international peer review groups have concluded that there is no clear evidence of links between RF exposure and excess risk of cancer. WHO has also concluded that there is no convincing scientific evidence that exposure to RF shortens the life span of humans, or that RF is an inducer or promoter of cancer. However, further studies are necessary.
Thermal effects: RF fields have been studied in animals, including primates. The earliest signs of an adverse health consequence, found in animals as the level of RF fields increased, include reduced endurance, aversion of the field and decreased ability to perform mental tasks. These studies also suggest adverse effects may occur in humans subjected to whole body or localized exposure to RF fields sufficient to increase tissue temperatures by greater than 1°C. Possible effects include the induction of eye cataracts, and various physiological and thermoregulatory responses as body temperature increases. These effects are well established and form the scientific basis for restricting occupational and public exposure to RF fields.
Non-thermal effects: Exposure to RF levels too low to involve heating, (i.e., very low SARs), has been reported by several groups to alter calcium ion mobility, which is responsible for transmitting information in tissue cells. However, these effects are not sufficiently established to provide a basis for restricting human exposure.
Pulsed RF fields: Exposure to very intense pulsed RF fields, similar to those used by radar systems, has been reported to suppress the startle response and evoke body movements in conscious mice. In addition, people with normal hearing have perceived pulse RF fields with frequencies between about 200 MHz and 6.5 GHz. This is called the microwave hearing effect. The sound has been variously described as a buzzing, clicking, hissing or popping sound, depending on the RF pulsing characteristics. Prolonged or repeated exposure may be stressful and should be avoided where possible.
RF shocks and burns: At frequencies less than 100 MHz, RF burns or shock may result from charges induced on metallic objects situated near radars. Persons standing in RF fields can also have high local absorption of the fields in areas of their bodies with small cross sectional areas, such as the ankles. In general, because of the higher frequencies that most modern radar systems operate, combined with their small beam widths, the potential for such effects is very small.
However, one must understand that HAARP itself is not evil — but the people who are using it at the moment are.
Here’s why according to the same patent:
In short, they could end their “climate change” stupidity right now by producing enough ozone to replenish that protective layer, reduce carbon monoxide and similar toxic oxides in the atmosphere, etc. and provide adequate rainfall in arid desert in Africa, at will.
They can also eliminate toxicity in the oceans to produce as much planktons as possible, and increase the fisherman’s catch. No more stranded mammals in sandy beaches everywhere.
However, the same people having the capability to control the weather are themselves promoting the “climate change”, or “global warming”, hoaxes. So, how can we expect them to be the solution?
In short, those same people who are occupying the halls of power are themselves creating all of these nonsense, that obviously they too can solve with what is already in their hands, are retarding our full potential as a civilization due to the misapplication of these scientific knowledge, and that’s the crux of the problem.
We need to be the solution. We need to act. Otherwise, just three units of these mobile HAARP platforms, masquerading as radars, can make the hurricane steerable by a common method known as triangulation.
Unnatural weather patterns suggest HAARP is still here. They may not look like it, but Doopler radars provide the same set of useful and treacherous functions, when so desired.
As stated above, the NEXRAD Doopler Weather Surveillance System operates under the S-Band frequency range of 2 – 4 GHz (or 2 – 4 billion pulses per second), which incidentally the same frequency by which our microwave ovens, and other common wireless devices operate.
The S band is a designation by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) for a part of the microwave band of the electromagnetic spectrum covering frequencies from 2 to 4 gigahertz (GHz)… The S band also contains the 2.4–2.483 GHz ISM band, widely used for low power unlicensed microwave devices such as cordless phones, wireless headphones (Bluetooth), wireless networking (WiFi), garage door openers, keyless vehicle locks, baby monitors as well as for medical diathermy machines and microwave ovens (typically at 2.495GHz).
In short, we are not making this all up. Cancer, euphoria in the midst of economic difficulty, and bad weather are mostly artificially induced at this point in time.
Air Force Bombshell: Admits They Can Control the Weather – HAARP
While HAARP and weather control has been called a conspiracy theory by the mainstream media and government officials, during a Senate hearing on Wednesday, David Walker, deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for science, technology and engineering, dropped a bombshell in answer to a question asked by Lisa Murkowski in relation to the dismantling of the $300 million High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program in Gakona this summer.
Walker said this is “not an area that we have any need for in the future” and it would not be a good use of Air Force research funds to keep HAARP going. “We’re moving on to other ways of managing the ionosphere, which the HAARP was really designed to do,” he said. “To inject energy into the ionosphere to be able to actually control it. But that work has been completed.”
Many believe HAARP was created and has been used for weather control, with enough juice to trigger hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes and comments such as this bring about the question of whether conspiracy theorists are more on target than anyone has admitted to date.
This is not the first time a public official has acknowledged that HAARP and weather control is not only possible, but has been and continues to be, used as a “super weapon,” as evidenced by a statement in 1997 by former U.S. Defense Secretary William Cohen, where he said:
“Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts.”
Is it still just a conspiracy theory if public officials admit it is true?
Are they really dismantling the Alaska based HAARP?
How about the floating HAARP transmitters masquerading as mobile radars used in the Philippines?