Those who warned that Corona “vaccinations“ were the first step towards the genetic manipulation of humans faced harsh attacks from quality media, politicians and activists who denied this and ridiculed the corresponding fears.
But all that is now moot: on 12 July 2021, the WHO itself let the cat out of the bag and published recommendations – available to everyone on the WHO website – on the genetic manipulation of humans “to promote public health“ (1).
The World Health Organisation, about which one could read in the media before the Corona crisis sentences such as “The WHO is itself on the Gates Foundation’s money drip“, writes in its news article “WHO issues new recommendations on human genome editing for the promotion of public health“ on the modification or manipulation of the human genome (1-3):
“Two new companion reports released today by the World Health Organization (WHO) provide the first global recommendations to help establish human genome editing as a tool for public health, with an emphasis on safety, effectiveness and ethics.
The forward-looking new reports result from the first broad, global consultation looking at somatic, germline and heritable human genome editing. The consultation, which spanned over two years, involved hundreds of participants representing diverse perspectives from around the world, including scientists and researchers, patient groups, faith leaders and indigenous peoples.
Human genome editing has the potential to advance our ability to treat and cure disease, but the full impact will only be realized if we deploy it for the benefit of all people, instead of fueling more health inequity between and within countries,‘ said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General.“
It is therefore a “good thing“ that since its last amendment, the genetic engineering law in Germany no longer includes all living beings as before, but now “all living beings except humans“.
The WHO, on the other hand, is apparently rock-solid in its assumption that “its recommendations“ on DNA manipulation will be implemented worldwide, although the population does not yet know anything about it. This is what the above-mentioned communication of the World Health Organisation says:
“The recommendations focus on systems-level improvements needed to build capacity in all countries to ensure that human genome editing is used safely, effectively, and ethically.“
2 thoughts on “W.H.O Recommends Genetic Manipulation and Gene Editing of Humans”
What the masses don’t yet realize is that once you accept or are forced to have the mRNA vaccines, which by the way, are patented, you will become the property of the pharmaceutical company because you are carrying their patented product within you and according to the SCOTUS, you no longer have any Human Rights because you are no longer considered to be human, just property. READ AND HEED !!!!
If you have been vaxed you are now OWNED!!!
And Have No More Access To HUMAN RIGHTS
Supreme Court, 2013 – Pathology vs Myriad Genetics
The Vaxed Can Be Patented (Owned)
Summary From The Net
In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 – Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc – the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is ‘a product of nature’. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court wrote that if you were to change a human’s genome by mRNA vaccines (being used currently) then the (altered) genome CAN be patented.
This means that everyone who has had the ‘vaccine’ is now technically ‘patented’. Anything that is patented is ‘owned’ and comes under the definition of ‘trans human’.
All people who are legally identified as being ‘trans human’ do not have access to Human Rights or any Rights granted by the State. That is because they are not classified as anything 100% organic or human.
Therefore, technically, anyone having this ‘vaccine’ can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands.
Full Supreme Court Ruling
I would beware of any ideas that Bill Gates comes up with. He is a multi-billionaire and is motivated strictly by profit. As for Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, I believe that he might have purer motives, but he has shown that he is easily manipulated by people of power.